To help you examine our very own next theory, we basic recoded, for each and every of the items into status scale, the newest portion of responses one to let you know when the husbands reduce, equal or maybe more scores, particularly, condition, that have hypogamy, which means husbands have straight down standing than wives, homogamy, definition equal standing, and you can hypergamy, meaning husbands having higher condition than wives. Into the potential connection out-of country, analyses was basically extreme during the training (X dos =eleven.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you will financial impression away from a prospective breakup (X 2 =nine.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Research showed that, having Foreign-language people, there’s significantly more knowledge hypogamy, while to possess Dominican participants there clearly was more degree homogamy. About the financial things in the event of divorce or separation, while there is alot more homogamy to own Foreign language people, there can be more hypergamy to own Dominicans (find Figure 1).

Which have previous failed marriages or perhaps not was not relevant so you’re able to variations in position. Concerning the prospective organization anywhere between status and you can age hitched, extreme associations had been included in health (X 2 =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though having lovers y exists (40.4%, each), to have couples y is out there (43.4%). This basically means, on group with more age married, husbands have all the way down health condition. Having students regarding previous failed marriages and achieving people out-of newest matrimony didn’t significantly apply at standing.

For the share, this new analyses towards second hypothesis revealed that as opposed to our standard, the biggest element related so you can status is the country.

Univariate tests found high differences in foundation step one (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

Ultimately, hypogamy points in the The country of spain scored significantly below hypogamy activities from inside the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; badoo-login p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).